Slavery was an undeniably inhumane,
brutal set of events that facilitated death, torture and involuntary servitude
of many Africans and African descendants. As much as it pains me to see
the brutality inherent in a movie about slavery, I feel compelled to watch.
It is the same feeling you get when someone says "do not look."
Inevitably, you will look. It is easy to enjoy the fruits of the
labor of my ancestors and forget about the sacrifices they made. This
movie serves as an immediate reminder of the hardships endured by my ancestors.
When I have children, there are a few movies that I will insist they
see. "12 Years a Slave" ("12 Years") is on that short
list.
The following words come to
mind when I think about this movie: compelling, frightening,
nightmare, reality, and history. In
case you did not know, 12 Years is a movie based on the true events of
Solomon Northup's life. His story is one of the most compelling,
frightening, and triumphant stories ever told. Solomon was an
African-American man born in Saratoga, New York in 1808. He was born a
free man, and he had a wife and two children. He had a career
as a practicing musician and was well educated. The sequences that led to
him being sold in the slave trade are unthinkable.
One of the most heart
wrenching scenes I have ever seen in a movie happened in 12 Years.
The scene I am about to describe happened relatively early in the movie
and really set the tone for what was in store for the viewing audience.
This particular scene shows Solomon waking up in a dirty, cold jail cell.
He was bound by chains on his hands and feet. As he woke up, the
look in his eyes was sheer horror and disbelief. He looked as if he was
waking up from a bad dream. Unfortunately, for him, the chains were real, and he was no longer a free man. He was no longer Solomon Northup;
instead, at that moment, he became Platt the slave. That scene
still sends chills up and down my spine each time I recall it.
Over the years, I have seen
a good share of slavery movies, including: "Roots,"
"Amistad," and "Glory." 12 Years is different than
each of those movies in a profound way. This movie showed the horrors of
slavery through the eyes of an educated, free, American born, black man. This
man was aware that slavery existed, but never thought he would be subjected to
it. Most slavery movies focus on slave transportation from Africa to the
United States of America. This movie, however, is different.
This movie delved
into the psyche of a learned man trying to rationalize how to survive in an
oppressive system that was inherently irrational. Although nothing exists
that can be compared to slavery directly, the closest analogy involves the
modern day prison system. Close your eyes. Imagine going out
with your friends one night and having too much to drink. Imagine
them driving you home and putting you to bed. Then, imagine waking up the
next morning inside a cold, dirty, jail cell in Russia. Imagine your
kidnappers telling you that you would spend the rest of your life working without
pay in a prison camp. Oh and, by the way, imagine that they tell you that you no longer will be referred to by the first and last name your parents
gave you. Now, you will be simply referred to as "Kunta."
As bad as that sounds, slavery was infinitely worse.
Watching how becoming a
slave gradually broke Solomon's will was very difficult. The process was
slow, methodical and somewhat subtle. At the beginning of 12 Years,
Solomon was a proud, intelligent, loving, father and husband. By the time
he had endured multiple years as a slave, he was no longer Solomon; instead, he
was "Platt." He had been transformed into a slave.
Without revealing too many
details from the movie, I will briefly discuss a couple subtle points. At
the beginning of his bondage, his owner told Solomon that his name was Platt.
Solomon let it be known that his name was Solomon. This was one of
the times he acted in a defiant manner. Also, in the beginning stages of
his bondage, he made eye contact with his master when he talked to him.
Many of Solomon's struggles
were a result of him being a rational man and his inability to understand the
relationship between slave owner and slave. This point resonates
with me because I am too an educated man. I can only imagine trying to
rationalize an inherently irrational set of rules that you must abide by when
those very rules cut against everything you have ever known to be true. A
quick example would be someone telling you that 2 plus 2 is 5. You know
that is not right, but you have to agree to it over and over and over again.
And, the only rational basis for the belief is because someone told
you so.
It hurt to see him towards
the end of his time as a slave. By that time, he had accepted his
name as Platt, he talked with his head down and did not make eye contact when
speaking with his master or any other white person. He even began singing
the slave spiritual songs that he had previously not sang. He was left
with a very tough decision. He had to choose between his dignity and
survival. He chose the latter. The transformation is subtle, but
evident if you pay attention.
Sometimes, everything about
a movie comes together perfectly. This movie showcased some of the best
acting I have ever seen. Three characters in this movie are worthy of
Oscar consideration.
Chiwetel Ejiofor's depiction
of Soloman Northup was exceptional. His role as Soloman/Platt is the best
depiction of a slave I have ever seen. You could see the pain in his eyes
during critical moments; you could feel the raw emotions through the lines he
delivered. He should win an Oscar award for Best Actor, and he should win
by a land slide. He was that good and his performance was nothing short
of exceptional.
Lupita Nyonongo'o's depiction
of Patsy deserves an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress. Her role as a
slave and prized field hand was well played. She was put in a no-win
situation because on the one hand, she was the apple of her sadistic owner's
eye. However, on the other hand, she was raped and brutalized by her
master and hated by her master's wife. Her role shed some light on the
rape culture that was prevalent. The horror and pure passion she
displayed in her depiction as Patsy is Oscar worthy.
Michael FassBender's role as
Platt and Patsy's master, Epps, was well played. Epps' character
displayed sadistic and psychotic behavior that many of the slave masters exhibited
during those times. He used many tactics to keep his slaves in check and
was known to be a "nigger breaker" amongst slaves and slave owners.
He used tactics such as violence, fear, degradation and even religion as
methods to exercise control over his slaves. You will hate his character
because he was a repulsive man, but if you take a step back, you will probably
appreciate the authenticity with which he depicted this character. His
performance is certainly worthy of a Best Supporting Actor role at the Oscar
Awards as well.
This movie is a must see.
It will make you feel a myriad of emotions, but it is worth seeing.
Peace
Very very interesting and enlightening
ReplyDeleteThank you. The movie is great. I hear the book is really good as well.
DeleteReally?!? I haven't had a chance to see the movie but I def want to....
ReplyDeleteYes indeed. The book is really short too. I reside in NC.
DeleteI will def check the movie out and I will let you know my thoughts in it....
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete