Friday, December 6, 2013

Is Kevin Durant Overrated?



I (SOM) have been writing this blog for just over two years.  This week, however, I am adding a different spin to it.  In the spirit of good-hearted debate, my boy from law school (CO) and I are going to engage in a debate regarding oft-discussed barbershop topics.  This week the topic is whether Kevin Durant is overrated.  He will be arguing that Durant is not overrated and of course, I will be taking the opposite position.

SOM: Kevin Durant is overrated. Durant has failed miserably at leading a team deep into the NBA Playoffs sans an all-star supporting cast.  Think about the all-time great players who have been able to accomplish this feat.  Lebron James led the Cleveland Cavaliers to the NBA Finals against the Spurs.  That team did not feature another all-star caliber player.  Allen Iverson carried his Philadelphia 76ers team to the NBA Finals without another star player.  Should we not hold Kevin Durant to this standard?  During the 2012-13 NBA Playoffs, Kevin Durant was afforded an opportunity to carry his team deep into the Playoffs after Russell Westbrook went down with an injury.  He was unable to do so, and honestly, his team barely defeated an average Houston Rockets team.

The Thunder advanced to the second round and faced the Memphis Grizzlies.  During that series, Durant struggled to make the other players around him better.  Sure, if you look at his statistics only, you might believe he had a solid series.  The truth is he was relegated to playing hero-ball.  He became a volume-shooter and a low percentage scorer.  He needed to elevate his game such that K. Martin and S. Ibaka could get easy shots.  He failed, and as a result, his team lost.  As the second best player in the World, basketball enthusiasts expect more from him.

CO: Kevin Durant is the second best player in the NBA. Yet, he remains an underrated basketball player because of numerous factors that mask his dominance. For instance, Durant was not drafted as the number one overall pick when he came out of Texas in 2007; that distinction belonged to Greg Oden. Thus, his shadow began to grow.

That is not to say that KD is not recognized as a top player in the league; it would be blasphemous to write an article or have a conversation about Kevin Wayne Durant without acknowledging that the general consensus knows Durant is a great player; a perennial All-Star that deserves to be mentioned in the upper echelon of players in the NBA. Durant has become a 4x NBA All Star, an All Star Game MVP and a 3x NBA Scoring Champion. He has accomplished a lot in his career thus far and (barring injury) is on pace to be in the Hall of Fame, should he continue at/near his current pace.

And yet, basketball enthusiasts do not anoint Kevin Durant as the present and future of the NBA. Durant is not considered as transcendent because he plays in a smaller market and he is the second best SF/wing player in the game. He does not dominate the ball and has not had a signature "superstar" playoff moment; even if the numbers say he is on pace for a HOF career that may place him in the top 20 players of all time.

Durant’s shot is his greatest weapon. Durant has been at or near the elusive “50-40-90" club of shooters (50% from the field, 40% from three point territory and 90% from the FT line) while simultaneously leading the NBA in scoring. As mark of his usage and efficiency, Durant has never averaged less than 20 points per game during his career. Durant is arguably the best shooter in today's game by any measure. Last season (2012-13), Durant became the first player in NBA history to record 20-plus made free throws in back-to-back games. He has been a relentlessly efficient scorer since his rookie year.

SOM: Russell Westbrook may be the driving force for OKC’s success.  Is there any doubt which player is the driving force for the Miami Heat?  The Miami Heat has sustained an impressive winning percentage without D. Wade in the lineup.  During those games, Lebron James elevated his game and the team experienced great success.  This year, when Westbrook was out of the Thunder’s lineup, Durant still scored, but his efficiency was not at the same level.  Is there a sports analyst in America that believed the Thunder would make any serious noise in the Playoffs without Westbrook?  What if D. Wade could not play for the Heat?  This has been the case for many games and I believe many analysts would give them a fighting chance for success because of one man—Lebron James.  Why can’t the same thing be said for Durant?

The best player on the team should be the driving force of that team and should make everyone else’s job easier.  Kevin Durant is the most talented player on his team, but the fact that he may not be the most important is a big knock against him.  Did anyone question which player was the driving force behind the Chicago Bulls’ championship runs in the 1990s?  Was there any doubt who was the most integral player during the 2000s when the Lakers won three NBA Championships in a row?  Until Durant establishes himself as the undisputed most important player on his team, he should not be compared to players like Jordan, Shaq and yes—L. James. 

CO: There is no denying Durant's scoring and shooting prowess. At 25, he already averages nearly 27 career points per game, has won NBA Rookie of the Year and has played in an NBA Finals. In spite of his wiry frame, he has led the NBA in free throws made (2009-10 to present) and has finished in the top five in NBA MVP voting and shares for five consecutive years.

However, these feats can go unnoticed playing in Oklahoma City. And while his market is a factor in diminishing his public adoration, LeBron James is the biggest factor in diminishing Durant's greatness. LeBron James is the best player in the NBA and has arguably been the best player in the NBA since the 2008-09 season, when James was already an MVP caliber player and championship contender for the Cleveland Cavaliers (sorry Kobe fans).

LeBron James has started at and has been called to defend all five positions (PG, SG, SF, PF and C) at various points in his career. His primary position is SF and his MVP reign began in 2008-09; one year before Kevin Durant became a dominant player and perennial All-Star we know today. This is unfortunate timing for Durant, who by many measures is the second best player in the NBA. For all of Durant’s scoring titles and efficiency, LeBron’s recent title accomplishments have dwafed Durant's and since LeBron's occurred in recent memory the media and fans take Durant’s accomplishments for granted.

For example, everyone knows Durant scores a lot of points; this is obvious to even causal basketball fans. From the start of his pro career, Kevin Durant was one of the most prolific scorers and has scored 8,128 points in his first four NBA seasons, which is a remarkable display of talent and consistency. However, he comes in second to LeBron James again. LeBron has scored more points through his first four NBA seasons than any other active NBA player today (8,439).

Most recently, Durant has come in second to LeBron James in MVP voting on three separate occasions. This is both an anomaly and a trend. As Durant begins to enter his prime, LeBron James stands in Durant’s path to the title and public acclaim. Unlike the LeBron vs. Kobe battles that consumed debate in the mid 2000s, Durant is only four years younger than LeBron and may endure the second place mantle for much longer before he can become both a champion and MVP.

SOM: Kevin Durant turns the ball over far too often.  Durant has averaged 3.2 turnovers per game during the course of his career.  That figure would not be as bad if he averaged more assists per game.  However, during his career, he has only averaged 3.2 assists per game.  Elite players typically have at least a 2 to 1 ratio with respect to assists to turnovers.  Durant’s ratio is not on par with other elite players and is indicative of his glaring inability to make other players around him better.  

Kevin Durant is a great scorer.  However, if he is the second best player in the World, he should perform at an elite level in more categories than just scoring.  Lebron James performs at an elite level in terms of scoring, defending and passing.  Also, he is a two time World Champion, which is further evidence of his ability to raise the level of players around him.  Michael Jordan was an elite defender and scorer.  He also possessed intangibles such as leadership, work ethic and competitive spirit that made him the best. Although not known for being a great passer, many of the biggest games of his career he made the pass to a player who hit the game winning or tying shot—he was a willing passer.  In all honesty, maybe Durant is not a first-tier all-time great type of talent.  Maybe he is a second tier guy along with guys like Tracey McGrady, Dominque Wilkins Carmelo Anthony and Reggie Miller.  Maybe he is a scoring specialist and is not worthy of being considered in the class with guys like Kobe, Jordan, Lebron and Magic.  Durant could be regarded as the best scorer the World has ever known and that is not a bad title.  Scoring comes naturally for Durant, so I am not nearly as impressed with his dominance in that area.  I would be impressed if Durant—like Lebron, Kobe and Jordan—could dominate multiple facets of the game.  Until Kevin Durant dominates a game with his passing, rebounding, or defense, he is only an elite scorer to me, and hence overrated.

CO: We, fans and critics, have now begun to take Durant’s greatness for granted. As a former UTexas star, we adulated his freshman accomplishments; Big 12 Player of the Year, Naismith and Wooden Award winner; Durant lived up to his McDonald’s All-American hype. Kevin Durant was the present and future back then. When he joined the Seattle Supersonics as a rookie, we continued to enjoy his ascent to the top ranks. Now things have begun to take a turn after LeBron finally won a title.

Since LeBron’s title shortcomings are no longer worth covering and Durant is fairly young to question his shortcomings, the trolling bandwagon of critics now seeks to insert other players in Durant’s rarified air: Paul George, Chris Paul and to a lesser degree, Derrick Rose. Critics have even sought to create drama by adding Durant’s current and former OKC teammates: Russell Westbrook and James Harden to the list of players who will make the “leap” to superstardom. Meanwhile, Durant remains the second best player in the NBA and MVP voting, and remains under the radar as the search for the next best player to LeBron becomes chic.

For now, I implore you to sit back and enjoy Durant’s greatness while we can. Let us not get caught star searching to the point we miss the ones in our midst. Kevin Durant is a rare player and we may not see another one like him again.

SOM: Basketball is a team sport.  Despite this irrefutable fact, sports fanatics love to focus on the individual components of the game.  Kevin Durant has been in the NBA for seven years, yet, he has not won an NBA title.  He has experienced great individual success along the way. All-time great players are judged—fairly or unfairly—on their ability to win titles, or at least one.  Maybe, it is not Durant’s fault that he does not have a ring, though.  He just happened to join the NBA during a time when an all-time great player was in his prime.  Does that set of facts sound familiar?  It should because Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, Reggie Miller, Patrick Ewing and John Stockton each ran into a juggernaut by the name of Michael Jordan.  Could that be the fate that awaits Kevin Durant?  It may be too early to definitively determine the answer to this question. Either way, championship rings are necessary for all-time great players nowadays. 

Durant is a great scorer, but otherwise he is overrated.



Peace

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

D. Rose: It Was All Good Just a Week Ago


This time last week, Derrick Rose was enjoying a stretch of some of the best basketball he had played all year.  Though he was not back to the all-star level of 2011, he was making progress.  He was becoming confident in his ability to move on the court.  The mental injury he suffered in 2012 was moving towards the back of his mind, or so it seemed.  I remember thinking that D. Rose would return to form by March or April 2014.  I was not sure that he would return to MVP level, but I was sure that it would be much better than what we had seen up until his most recent injury.  Then, it happened, again.  

The "it" was yet another horrific knee injury.  This injury was the second time in as many years that he sustained a horrible knee injury while performing a normal basketball move.  I believe it is much easier to deal with an injury when you know exactly what caused it.  For instance, if you sprain or break your ankle because you land awkwardly on someone else's foot, you can logically deduce that an injury would occur.  However, in Rose's case, nothing unusual happened.  He was simply doing what he normally does and was severely injured in the process.  Mentally, that has to be a very tough pill to swallow.

I am not a physician, but I deal with personal injury matters on a daily basis.  I would be willing to bet that Rose's right knee injury was a result of him overcompensating for his  reconstructed left knee.  The human body is very sensitive and sometimes, the slightest change can adversely impact it.  Have you ever sprained your back and then noticed pain in your legs?  If you have, then you know exactly what I mean.  The only way to avoid overcompensating for one body part is to truly be confident that you are healthy.  The slightest thought of doubt can  lead to second guessing which can lead to further injury.  I believe that is what happened to Rose.  

Major injuries have ruined, or at least shorted, the careers of many great players.  Penny Hardaway, Grant Hill, Tracey McGrady and Yao Ming come to mind immediately.  Each player, when healthy, was one of the best in the game.  However, because of bad knees, ankles and backs, their careers were shortened.  I hope Rose will be able to make a complete comeback and be the player that he once was, but I must say that I am not convinced.  

What made Derrick Rose a superstar in the NBA?  His athleticism, power, explosiveness and reckless disregard for contact.  He was able to play at 150 miles per hour with no fear of injury.  He was a below average shooter and his court vision was decent, but not great.  You would not say he was a great point guard, but you would say he was a great player.  He played hard at all times and when his basketball intellect failed, his athleticism more than made up for it. If his legs are not healthy, and more importantly, if his mind is not settled, he will likely never be the player many of us enjoyed watching.  

In order for him to become an all-star caliber player once again, and I think he can, he will need to modify his game. If you look at Chris Paul's game before his knee problems, he was a lot more explosive.  However, because he is such an intelligent player, he modified his game so he could be dominant, albeit in a slightly different manner.  If Rose is able to realize that he might not lead the NBA in highlight reel dunks, I think he can still be very productive and reach an all-star level.  He will certainly need to improve his jump shot and his ability to probe defenses during pick-and-roll situations.  He will need to work on his change-of-pace moves as well.  I hope he is able and willing to make the changes necessary to prolong his career.

The Chicago Bulls have to go in a different direction with the franchise.  They can no longer continue to wait for Rose to save them.  The organization needs to look for another "A" level player to compliment Rose.  If that means that Derrick Rose becomes the second best player on his team, so be it.  His knees will not allow him to carry a team for 82 games and into the playoffs like he was once able to do.  They can likely package Deng and maybe Boozer together in a deal for another superstar talent.  Let's be honest, when is the last time you saw a team with one star win an NBA Championship?  It was unrealistic to think that Rose and a bunch of role players would be able to do it.  If Rose is able to get over his mental injury, and if he is able to modify his game, I think he will have a long, successful career ahead of him.  If not, we may be saying the infamous words "it was all good just a week ago" yet again.  



Peace

Sunday, November 3, 2013

12 Years a Slave: Just a Few Thoughts



Slavery was an undeniably inhumane, brutal set of events that facilitated death, torture and involuntary servitude of many Africans and African descendants.  As much as it pains me to see the brutality inherent in a movie about slavery, I feel compelled to watch.  It is the same feeling you get when someone says "do not look."  Inevitably, you will look. It is easy to enjoy the fruits of the labor of my ancestors and forget about the sacrifices they made.  This movie serves as an immediate reminder of the hardships endured by my ancestors.  When I have children, there are a few movies that I will insist they see.  "12 Years a Slave" ("12 Years") is on that short list.      
The following words come to mind when I think about this movie: compelling, frightening, nightmare, reality, and history.  In case you did not know, 12 Years is a movie based on the true events of Solomon Northup's life. His story is one of the most compelling, frightening, and triumphant stories ever told.  Solomon was an African-American man born in Saratoga, New York in 1808.  He was born a free man, and he had a wife and two children.  He had a career as a practicing musician and was well educated.  The sequences that led to him being sold in the slave trade are unthinkable.  

One of the most heart wrenching scenes I have ever seen in a movie happened in 12 Years.  The scene I am about to describe happened relatively early in the movie and really set the tone for what was in store for the viewing audience.  This particular scene shows Solomon waking up in a dirty, cold jail cell.  He was bound by chains on his hands and feet.  As he woke up, the look in his eyes was sheer horror and disbelief.  He looked as if he was waking up from a bad dream.  Unfortunately, for him, the chains were real, and he was no longer a free man. He was no longer Solomon Northup; instead, at that moment, he became Platt the slave. That scene still sends chills up and down my spine each time I recall it.    

Over the years, I have seen a good share of slavery movies, including: "Roots," "Amistad," and "Glory."  12 Years is different than each of those movies in a profound way.  This movie showed the horrors of slavery through the eyes of an educated, free, American born, black man. This man was aware that slavery existed, but never thought he would be subjected to it.  Most slavery movies focus on slave transportation from Africa to the United States of America.  This movie, however, is different.    

This movie delved into the psyche of a learned man trying to rationalize how to survive in an oppressive system that was inherently irrational.  Although nothing exists that can be compared to slavery directly, the closest analogy involves the modern day prison system.  Close your eyes. Imagine going out  with your friends one night and having too much to drink.  Imagine them driving you home and putting you to bed. Then, imagine waking up the next morning inside a cold, dirty, jail cell in Russia. Imagine your kidnappers telling you that you would spend the rest of your life working without pay in a prison camp.  Oh and, by the way, imagine that they tell you that you no longer will be referred to by the first and last name your parents gave you.  Now, you will be simply referred to as "Kunta."  As bad as that sounds, slavery was infinitely worse.  

Watching how becoming a slave gradually broke Solomon's will was very difficult.  The process was slow, methodical and somewhat subtle.  At the beginning of 12 Years, Solomon was a proud, intelligent, loving, father and husband.  By the time he had endured multiple years as a slave, he was no longer Solomon; instead, he was "Platt." He had been transformed into a slave.   

Without revealing too many details from the movie, I will briefly discuss a couple subtle points.  At the beginning of his bondage, his owner told Solomon that his name was Platt. Solomon let it be known that his name was Solomon.  This was one of the times he acted in a defiant manner.  Also, in the beginning stages of his bondage, he made eye contact with his master when he talked to him.    

Many of Solomon's struggles were a result of him being a rational man and his inability to understand the relationship between slave owner and slave.  This point resonates with me because I am too an educated man.  I can only imagine trying to rationalize an inherently irrational set of rules that you must abide by when those very rules cut against everything you have ever known to be true.  A quick example would be someone telling you that 2 plus 2 is 5.  You know that is not right, but you have to agree to it over and over and over again.  And, the only rational basis for the belief is because someone told you so.  

It hurt to see him towards the end of his time as a slave.  By that time, he had accepted his name as Platt, he talked with his head down and did not make eye contact when speaking with his master or any other white person.  He even began singing the slave spiritual songs that he had previously not sang.  He was left with a very tough decision.  He had to choose between his dignity and survival.  He chose the latter.  The transformation is subtle, but evident if you pay attention.  

Sometimes, everything about a movie comes together perfectly.  This movie showcased some of the best acting I have ever seen. Three characters in this movie are worthy of Oscar consideration.

Chiwetel Ejiofor's depiction of Soloman Northup was exceptional.  His role as Soloman/Platt is the best depiction of a slave I have ever seen.  You could see the pain in his eyes during critical moments; you could feel the raw emotions through the lines he delivered.  He should win an Oscar award for Best Actor, and he should win by a land slide.  He was that good and his performance was nothing short of exceptional.  

Lupita Nyonongo'o's depiction of Patsy deserves an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.  Her role as a slave and prized field hand was well played.  She was put in a no-win situation because on the one hand, she was the apple of her sadistic owner's eye. However, on the other hand, she was raped and brutalized by her master and hated by her master's wife.  Her role shed some light on the rape culture that was prevalent.  The horror and pure passion she displayed in her depiction as Patsy is Oscar worthy.  

Michael FassBender's role as Platt and Patsy's master, Epps, was well played.  Epps' character displayed sadistic and psychotic behavior that many of the slave masters exhibited during those times.  He used many tactics to keep his slaves in check and was known to be a "nigger breaker" amongst slaves and slave owners.  He used tactics such as violence, fear, degradation and even religion as methods to exercise control over his slaves.  You will hate his character because he was a repulsive man, but if you take a step back, you will probably appreciate the authenticity with which he depicted this character.  His performance is certainly worthy of a Best Supporting Actor role at the Oscar Awards as well.  

This movie is a must see.  It will make you feel a myriad of emotions, but it is worth seeing.


Peace

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Derrick Rose: The Return



Derrick Rose has been out of NBA circles for more than one year now.  Before he tore his ACL in April 2012, he was widely considered a top-five player in the NBA.  He was one year removed from a NBA MVP Award.  He was praised as the savior for a Chicago Bulls franchise that had not experienced much success since Michael Jordan retired.  When he went down with an injury, the hopes of the franchise were momentarily lost.  But, now, those hopes are once again shared among the many Chicago Bulls fans.  

Derrick Rose is a special talent for multiple reasons.  He is the most athletic point guard in the NBA.  His ability to dominate basketball games is predicated on his ability to be faster, stronger, and more explosive than the point guards who attempt to guard him.  Without his explosiveness, I am not sure he would be as effective.  I have never heard him described as a particularly “heady” player or someone who is a "true" point guard.  Those compliments are usually reserved for Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo and Deron Williams.  He uses his athleticism effectively on both ends of the court.  Because of his lateral quickness, and ability to anticipate opposing players’ moves, he has become a really good position defender.  In many respects, he anchors the Chicago Bulls’ defense. 

The City of Chicago has experienced a lot of turmoil over the last few years as a result of gang violence and a murder rate that rivals wars in other countries.  Many young, inner city Chicago residents do not have much hope  that they can overcome their unfortunate situations.  Derrick Rose, as Chicago's prodigal son, represents a breath of fresh air for many of these young kids.  Rose is from Chicago and grew up in a gang-infested part of the City.  Despite these seemingly insurmountable odds, he survived and flourished.  He attended college, albeit for only one year.  He has conducted himself as a professional on and off the court and has never had any issues that so many young, professional athletes cannot seem to escape.  He also seems to have a humble spirit and genuinely loves the game.  His latest commercial depicts his love for the game.  At the end of the commercial, and I am paraphrasing, he states: What would be left without the fame and money of the NBA?  His response is “everything.”  For some folks I would dismiss the comment as a marketing ploy, but for Rose, I truly believe he means what he said.  

The NBA regular season is right around the corner.  That said, Rose’s long-awaited return is only a few days away.  As if that were not a big enough occurrence, the Bulls open up their season against the defending NBA Champions, the Miami Heat.  The media will be all over that game.  I have watched Rose play a few games during the preseason, and he looks like he is back to form.  He even stated that he is now more explosive and also that his vertical leap has increased by five inches.  That is a scary thought for opposing point guards.  He is certainly coming for Chris Paul’s title as the best point guard in the game.  I cannot wait to see him square off with Paul, Kyrie Irving, Ty Lawson, Russell Westbrook, and many of the other great point guards in the league.  Rose has acknowledged that he has a bullseye on his back (no pun intended) and that many of the young point guards in the league will attempt to make a name for themselves by dismantling him.  Somehow, I am not convinced they will be successful.  Welcome back D. Rose!


Peace

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Jury Trial: Second Chair

Writing is therapeutic for me and I have not written a blogpost in a few weeks.  I apologize for the absence and appreciate your continued support.  I have been extremely busy during the last few weeks, and had not had the opportunity to collect my thoughts until tonight. 

The Wheels of Justice Turn Slowly

I began working on a case in early 2012.  I   never expected the case to proceed to a jury trial.  I figured it would settle at a mediated settlement conference, or shortly thereafter.  As a civil litigator, most of my cases are resolved in a settlement agreement.  There are times when I am able to argue motions before judges, but the majority of my cases are settled.  I do not know the exact date when mandatory mediation became the practice in North Carolina, but I think it was the mid 1990s.  Before North Carolina adopted this procedure, civil litigators were consistently taking cases to trial.  Now, things are a little bit different.

Mandatory Mediation

Before any civil superior court case (any case where damages are alleged in an amount over $10,000.00) can proceed to a jury trial, the parties involved must participate in a mandatory mediation.  A mediation is a proceeding whereby a neutral third party facilitates negotiations between adverse parties.  It is a very useful procedure that usually means the case will settle before proceeding to trial.  During the mediation, each side weighs the risks inherent in proceeding to trial and after careful consideration, the parties usually decide to settle.  This has been the reality I have faced during my short legal career, until now.

Trial Continued

The case I previously mentioned was originally set for trial in August 2013.  However, because of a conflict of interest with the trial judge, the case was continued.  After the continuation, I put the case out of my mind.  I just figured that I should not get my hopes up because I just knew it would settle.  As has been the case many times in my life, I was wrong.

Trial Preparation

Once I realized the case would be tried before a jury, I began feverishly researching issues, drafting pre-trial motions and participating in strategy meetings in preparation for trial.  It was at this point that I realized how a case actually comes together.  As a junior attorney, I often work with senior partners, and despite my best efforts, they seem to be a step or two ahead of me.  I realized at this point why that was the case.  They have the experience that I am gaining, so they see the case differently than I do.  It the equivalent of a good basketball player who is talented but inexperienced being defeated by a more seasoned basketball player (remember when Kobe played against MJ early in his career?)  If you know anything about basketball, it is clear that Kobe gained the necessary experience, and is now a first ballot hall-of-famer.  Experience is the best teacher. 

Competitive Nature

I am competitive by nature and I like to think that I am a pretty intelligent individual.  That said, trial work gives me an opportunity to match wits with much more seasoned attorneys. It is fun and I am thankful to be able to do something that I truly enjoy.  I will talk about the jury trial sometime in the near future.  


Peace

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Money Team: 45-0

Floyd Mayweather is one of the most hated and loved athletes of all time.  Some attend his boxing matches because they want him to finally lose a match.  Others attend his matches because they appreciate his skill set.  Some folks could care less about Floyd, but, even these folks take notice when Floyd has a match.

During 2012, Floyd was the highest earning athlete in the world.  He earned 85 million that year, and he only fought two times.  He earned 40 million when he fought Victor Ortiz and 45 million when he fought Miguel Cotto.  To provide some context for how much money he made that year when compared with his contemporaries, let's examine exhibit A, Lebron James.  In 2012, Lebron, who is probably the most recognizable name in all of sports, only earned 53 million.  Let's put that in perspective though.  Lebron earned 13 million in salary/earnings from the Miami Heat.  So what does that mean?  Well, it means that he began training camp in October and played non-stop basketball until June.  Floyd, on the other hand, trained a few months for each fight and earned at least 40 million per fight.  

People are bothered by Mayweather's persona.  However, we have to remember that he is an entertainer.  That said, the "Money Team," and "Money Mayweather" monikers are likely just part of his act.  How many of us know athletes or entertainers on a personal level? If I had a dollar for every time someone said "I like Kobe's game, but I do not like him as a person," I would be a wealthy man.  So, let me get this straight, you actually know the guy and he personally did something to you, right?  I will digress, but I hope this point has been well stated. I do not personally know Mayweather, nor do I care to meet him.  However, I appreciate his prowess inside the ring and understand that he is an entertainer.

Mayweather did not attain a MBA from Wharton Business School.  Despite a lack of formal marketing training, he has mastered the key concepts of marketing.  He completely eliminated the middle man known as the promoter.  He independently promotes his  fights because he realizes that what a promoter could do for him (for a hefty fee), he can do for himself.  He is always careful to give proper respect to his opponent after a fight.  Last night, he thanked the fans from Mexico and all fans for buying his fight on pay per view.  He is a marketing genius.  

If you have ever watched the HBO series titled 24/7, you know how hard Floyd works at his craft.  He has the same work ethic possessed by Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant.  He believes he is the best, and it is difficult to argue against his contention.  After all, he has never lost a professional fight.  He has entered the ring against professional fighters, in different weight classes, 45 times, and he has emerged 45 times with a victory.  It may be too early to say that he is the greatest pound-for-pound fighter in the history of the sport, but, if he fights a few more years, and remains undefeated, he would deserve to be in the conversation.  Reasonable minds can differ, so I do not think he would ever be hailed as a consensus GOAT.  

Whether you love Mayweather, or whether you hate him, I would be willing to bet a small sum of money that you will be watching his next fight.  You care.


Peace